Blackstone CTO John Stecher and Norm AI CTO Scott Worland discuss where to invest as models improve in this 21-minute AI Engineer conversation.
Fix the data and automate the stable path
- Stecher puts accessible, well-managed data ahead of adding agents to a business process.
- Keep repeatable work in ordinary code, then use agents where the workflow needs judgment.
- Test model, tool-running software, and data changes against the same task-quality checks.
Keep the tests when the workflow becomes obsolete
- Worland says Norm accumulated tens of thousands of expert-labeled examples while building its earlier structured workflows.
- Testing newer agent approaches against those examples showed that much of the old workflow code was getting in the way.
- The team reset its platform design around agentic client experiences and AI-assisted development.
- Invest deeply in task evidence, benchmarks, and security boundaries; keep model-specific workflow choices replaceable.
Decide whether to build, prototype, or wait
- Stecher sometimes delays nonurgent work when expected model improvements could make it cheaper without sacrificing business value.
- For uncertain ideas, he favors fast, disposable proofs of value that users can try.
- Production still needs cybersecurity review, supported infrastructure, traceable execution, and monitoring.
- Norm requires human oversight for changes to core security-sensitive primitives, even as surrounding applications become easier to rebuild.
Reconsider the cost of keeping old software
- Compare rewriting a small internal application with continuing to maintain it as development costs change.
- Worland’s metaphor is to build conduits for improving models, while keeping core boundaries locked down.
- Caveat: these are the speakers’ operating judgments; the discussion supplies no controlled ROI study or numerical comparison of old and new systems.
“Straight through processing still matters.” — John Stecher, 2:27